Bush goes.

[strredwolf]

Sylvan (<lj user="joshuwain") pointed out an article on Salon about how the economy is doing under President G.W. Bush's undertaking: http://archive.salon.com/opinion/feature/2004/01/19/no_jobs/index.html (The article requires a subscription or viewed ad, which requires Flash) The article itself presents a fairly analytical view of how the economy has been doing with relation to job growth. Unfortunately, the end result is "we're not making any new jobs -- we're LOOSING them." Dubya is aiming for a jobless recovery, which given the increasing population is not the best for the nation! I saw that we needed to strike Aftganistan due to Sept 11th. I knew we had to clean up after Sadam from our first war, but aparently both him and us were duped by his underlings. And now, we're being screwed over. I should be out of my parents house, having a good education, and a good job, by now! I'm not voting for Bush. He must go. We need to concentrate more on the nation now.

Comments

[kesarra.livejournal.com]

You've made me more depressed than I already am. Fuel for the midlife crisis, woohoo.
What's the first step to a solution? Getting Bush out? Maybe, but part of that should also be "PEOPLE NEED TO STOP F&CKING" with a sub clause that says "with the end result being ANY children". When a couple million humans live within a 30 mile radius area, there a problem with population. That same sized area has an ok time feeding 5+ mountain lions, who don't weigh much more than your average human. When did 5 = a couple million? Nobody is worried about this? Are you all blind? You expect to find a job when millions are going for the same job? Bwahaha.

There's no such thing as a free ride and when 50 other people are trying for the same free ride you all get screwed. Then the virus spreads and those that payed their way into a ride get 51 people in their lap. What's the use?

Sorry for going off in your journal Redwolf.