STrRedWolf (
strredwolf) wrote2007-08-15 10:31 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It goes all the way down...
ZDNet got detailed closeups of the Endeavour's damage tiles.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?p=662
I may be outside NASA's items, but that's a solid case for PATCH THAT THING NOW!!! and DON'T LAND YET!
http://blogs.zdnet.com/emergingtech/?p=662
I may be outside NASA's items, but that's a solid case for PATCH THAT THING NOW!!! and DON'T LAND YET!
no subject
They probably have to break a tile entirely off before it would fail like the last one did.
What I don't understand though is why they don't put some sort of ablative coating on the tiles to protect them from that first few minutes of the launch, but that would burn off quickly on reentry. Maybe even the same foam they put on the tank. Maybe put some thin layer on with some film that allows it to be quickly removed by a spacewalk.
no subject
no subject
What I'm saying is that if you put the same kind or another kind of foam above (or below, depending on your perspective) the tiles to take the damage of the foam from the tanks... Some foam that will easily burn off or be removable later.
no subject
no subject
no subject
What I've read is that NASA thinks it's safe for the _crew_ for the Endeavour to land, but that it might end up causing some structural damage to the shuttle. Considering how dangerous a spacewalk is considered, they're trying to determine if the potential shuttle damage is worth the walk.
Basically, there's an aluminum pad underneath the tile, that actually distributes the heat. The tiles are somewhat ablative, to shed heat through throwing off particles. (I could be blowing smoke out my ass on that one, however).
(Note how the tile is gouged, not chipped)