Counting down to SCO's death...
Jul. 31st, 2005 12:05 amAfter a long day, I read up on Groklaw that Novell has filed an answer to SCO's Unix copyright claims...
...and it doesn't look good for SCO.
In short, SCO tried to pull a fast one, and was caught. They tried to get the System V Release 10 (SVRX) Unix copyright from Novell. Novell constantly refused, even in it's contract for the licencing of SVRX. It turns out SCO's not allowed to even offer Unix licences w/o Novell's permission -- and if it did, it has to pay Novell 95% of the cost.
Ooops.
So Novell's moved to have the judge force SCO to:
I would not be a lawyer for SCO at this time, because it looks like they're not going to get paid. They really screwed the pooch this time.
I really should start playing around with Novell's SuSE Linux again...
...and it doesn't look good for SCO.
In short, SCO tried to pull a fast one, and was caught. They tried to get the System V Release 10 (SVRX) Unix copyright from Novell. Novell constantly refused, even in it's contract for the licencing of SVRX. It turns out SCO's not allowed to even offer Unix licences w/o Novell's permission -- and if it did, it has to pay Novell 95% of the cost.
Ooops.
So Novell's moved to have the judge force SCO to:
- Pay up, not just the 95%, but EVERYTHING related to any Unix licence it has. That includes licences done with Sun Microsystems and Microsoft.
- Own up to it's contract, and do what it says, not what SCO thinks it means.
- put all of SCO's assets in a trust until it pays up (because they're selling everything left and right just to pay for the lawsuits)
- drop all the Linux silliness with IBM, Sequent, and other SVRX and Linux licences, because they had no authority to even sue them.
I would not be a lawyer for SCO at this time, because it looks like they're not going to get paid. They really screwed the pooch this time.
I really should start playing around with Novell's SuSE Linux again...