(no subject)

[strredwolf]

Blame joshuwain for this one... which is quite interesting. It's a "Which candidate is suited for you" set up on AOL by CNN and Time Magazine (ahh yes, all Time/Warner stuff). So I run through it.

It does ask you your opinion on various items. Unforutnately, it's missing on Internet policy. :( However, all said and done, it says I'm 100% compatible with voting for Kerry, followed by Kucinich, Sharpton, Edwards, and Dean in 5th place. Kerry has held office, and has been in the military. Nobody else has that combination.

Dean's out because of the Scream and his statements.
Sharpton's out because of his statements, and that he holds a religious office.

I think I'm voting for Kerry.

http://www.presidentmatch.com/Main.jsp2?cp=main

Comments

[smilodon.livejournal.com]

From what I can tell what really has derailed Dean has been a lack of organization behind the scenes of his campaign. I liked him as a canidate but if he falls apart this early in the primary campaign he may not have what it takes to go up against Bush.

Interesting

[kazriko.livejournal.com]

It says Bush would be the best candidate for me. I don't really like him, but I do think the rest of the candidates are even worse.

Oddly enough, it says my next closest match would be Lieberman and Kerry. *shrug*

This poll is a bit incomplete, it doesn't touch on internet issues at all, and those are probably the most important to me.

Sharpton rated last for me, no big surprise. ;)

Re: Interesting

[kazriko.livejournal.com]

Oh, btw, When it says 100% compatable, that's fairly meaningless. It rated me as 100% compatable with bush, but I looked through the list and I matched up with him on less than 50% of the questions, its just that I matched with the democrats even less.