Let's be honest with ourselves here. I have no idea what you supposedly did on the wikipedia, so I'll just gloss over that bit. My point here is that the [1] and [2] are both described with reasonable accuracy. Naturally that's not in any way a weasel, but I can see how someone not familiar with you would get that idea.
The real problem here isn't with how they've described the latter parts. And, before you call me a troll, it's not that you created such content, either. The problem is that things that you (and I, to some extent) find innocuous and charming are, to them, horrible affronts to The Creator (tm).
I'm not exactly sure I can explain why I'm posting this. It seems like an important distinction to me. And it frames a question nicely: What DID you do on the wikipedia?
no subject
The real problem here isn't with how they've described the latter parts. And, before you call me a troll, it's not that you created such content, either. The problem is that things that you (and I, to some extent) find innocuous and charming are, to them, horrible affronts to The Creator (tm).
I'm not exactly sure I can explain why I'm posting this. It seems like an important distinction to me. And it frames a question nicely: What DID you do on the wikipedia?